As usual, the dems don't actually care about Thomas or anything really - just outcomes. They want the court to return to a pre-Trump era of rubber-stamping bad ideas, and if that means leaking text, throwing fits and rolling around in the aisles, then so be it. They'd probably resort to murder, like in Venezuela, if they thought they could get away with it... and considering the DC DA, they just may. Sucks, but I guess that's par for the course with the Big Guy in office.
Two things: 1) Now I see why so many Leftist/liberal people hate Clarence Thomas even more than they hate the average black conservative: he's married to a white woman! So much of the last 20 years makes more sense now;
2) "Guess that’s why I don’t qualify for a job at USA Today." Although sometimes used as an excuse for not hiring someone, this is the first actual incidence of someone not getting the job because he is OVERqualified!
Get off my phone? 'scuse you. I read one of the nation's finest newsletters on a computer screen with one hand on the mouse (pinky up) the whole time like a damned gentleman. Now where's that fancy mustard I asked the guy in the other car for?
"If there’s no set definition of “woman,” why did Biden need to nominate one?"
If there's no set definition of "woman," why do we need Title IX? Fairness, in those conditions, would dictate that a person's gender be considered irrelevant for grouping them with other sports competitors.
Did anyone ever demand that George Conway shut up so as not to influence his wife Kellyanne's work as a key advisor to the President? Or did anyone ever insinuate that George Conway's rantings affected his wife Kellyanne's views, opinions, or work in the slightest?
As usual, the dems don't actually care about Thomas or anything really - just outcomes. They want the court to return to a pre-Trump era of rubber-stamping bad ideas, and if that means leaking text, throwing fits and rolling around in the aisles, then so be it. They'd probably resort to murder, like in Venezuela, if they thought they could get away with it... and considering the DC DA, they just may. Sucks, but I guess that's par for the course with the Big Guy in office.
Two things: 1) Now I see why so many Leftist/liberal people hate Clarence Thomas even more than they hate the average black conservative: he's married to a white woman! So much of the last 20 years makes more sense now;
2) "Guess that’s why I don’t qualify for a job at USA Today." Although sometimes used as an excuse for not hiring someone, this is the first actual incidence of someone not getting the job because he is OVERqualified!
Get off my phone? 'scuse you. I read one of the nation's finest newsletters on a computer screen with one hand on the mouse (pinky up) the whole time like a damned gentleman. Now where's that fancy mustard I asked the guy in the other car for?
"If there’s no set definition of “woman,” why did Biden need to nominate one?"
If there's no set definition of "woman," why do we need Title IX? Fairness, in those conditions, would dictate that a person's gender be considered irrelevant for grouping them with other sports competitors.
Did anyone ever demand that George Conway shut up so as not to influence his wife Kellyanne's work as a key advisor to the President? Or did anyone ever insinuate that George Conway's rantings affected his wife Kellyanne's views, opinions, or work in the slightest?