Elizabeth Warren Wants to Put Up Tents and Kill White People
Just like her ancestors
The Democrats are the party of ideas. Maybe one day they’ll come up with a good one.
Take it away, Fauxcahontas!

It makes sense that Elizabeth Warren wants to put up tents and kill white people. Hey, it was good enough for her ancestors.
She’s just one of the many Dems who are reeling, now that Roe v. Wade has been aborted. They have absolutely no idea what to do, and it’s wonderful.
Here’s another example. The great thing about Kamala Harris is… um… let me get back to you on that one. But she’s always good for a quote that either means nothing or actually hurts the argument she’s trying to make.
Here’s the former:
And here’s the latter:

Yeah, it means your son should be careful not to get a girl pregnant if the two of them aren’t ready or willing to raise a child. It means he needs to learn that his actions have consequences. It means sex isn’t merely a recreational activity. It means a baby is a human being, not just a disposable inconvenience.
How is that knowledge a bad thing?
I love when libs say crap like, “What will we tell our children and grandchildren about the overturning of Roe v. Wade?” You can tell them whatever you want, because you haven’t killed them!
It’s always amusing when they make an argument that the right has been making forever, but they act like they just thought of it. Remember the guy from Thirtysomething? No, not him, the other one. No, the other other one. Ken Olin. Well, Ken is now sixtysomething, and he’s got an interesting idea:

Yes. That’s how it’s worked since the dawn of recorded history. Ol’ Ken really thinks he’s stumbled onto something there, doesn’t he?
And how about this, Ken: The father and mother could enter into some sort of legal union where they promise to raise the child together. Maybe they could make it official with some sort of ceremony. Just throwing out some random ideas here.
Also, notice how Ken singled out the moment of conception. That almost sounds like he’s admitting a fetus is a human being. He’s really owning the conservatives, huh?
The libs are having a very tough time with this one. They’ve had half a century to prepare for the correction of the Roe v. Wade mistake, yet they’ve been caught completely flatfooted.
Tee-hee!
Meanwhile:

Just because Republicans are doing something to help women doesn’t mean they should feel like they’re doing something to help women.
NBC News is laying the groundwork to justify vandalism and violence against pregnancy centers and churches and other enemy outposts. Journos and their fellow libs are against political violence, unless it helps them achieve their goals.
Remember when Hunter Biden left one of his laptops at a repair shop less than five miles from his father’s house? Did you believe the Democrats when they claimed it was “Russian disinformation”? Of course not, nobody did.
Hunter’s laptop just keeps paying dividends:



It’s a good thing Joe Biden isn’t a Republican, or every single news outlet in the world would be all over this story. You wouldn’t hear anything else for weeks or months. But as it is:

They sure ain’t our friends.
Hillary Clinton really has a problem with black people, doesn’t she? First she tried to keep one out of the White House, and now this:

Take it from an expert. Hillary is a connoisseur of resentment, grievance, and anger.
Just look at this evil shrew:
She’s like a cartoon villain. Shaggy and Scooby are about to run in and pull off her mask.
Happy Birthday to Mel Brooks, who is 96 today! I kinda want to see this new documentary he’s in:
I think I went to an automat when I was a kid? Or probably I just saw one on TV. It’s all kind of a blur. Maybe my memory will improve when I’m as young as Mel.
Hope you’re having a good Tuesday. If not, there’ll be another one in a week or so.
If you liked what you just read, or you just want to condemn me to a lifetime of typing for money, please subscribe.
On the whole, non-leftist media outlets and the personalities on which they appear and provide commentary, as well as most everyone who is not a leftist have benefited from the double-standard to which they've been held by the egregiously dishonest corporate legacy media apparatus because our views, our arguments, absolutely MUST be well-reasoned and make sense - the left has not been held to ANY kind of standard, and the media allows them to utter complete contradictory nonsense that is treated as compelling argument.
If the left ever IS held to the same standard as the rest of us, the quality of public debate and exchange will undoubtedly improve, but it will take generations.
I am in that majority of Americans who think first trimester abortion should be legal but am against anything later than that without a damn good reason beyond "I changed my mind." But having said that, I completely agree with your rant above.
There are a few misconceptions I've found among pro-abortion people (which differ from pro-choice people).
(1) They do not magically teleport the baby out of the womb. Depending on how far along the mother is, an abortion is either messy with a lot of bleeding (chemically induced) or really, really traumatic, as traumatic as giving birth, though you end up with a dismembered corpse, which seems even more traumatic. And abortions damage the reproductive system just as much as miscarriage does, because that's exactly what it is, a forced miscarriage.
(2) With 200 abortions for every 1000 live births, abortions are not limited to incest and rape cases, nor cases of women whose lives are in danger. In fact, those are such a infinitesimally small fraction of the cases as to be considered little more than a talking point, and a disingenuous one at that because it's quite clear that abortions are being used as a substitute for birth control and forethought.
(3) Women have many options before conception and many options after if abortion is not on the table. These people seem to think that it's abortion or the Handmaiden's Tale.
(4) Fetuses are not masses of cells that take on a human form as they pass through the vagina to appear as a baby. (I know this seems obvious to most, but it doesn't seem to be to a lot of pro-abortion people I've had the pleasure of arguing with.)
(5) Abortion is becoming an almost transparent attempt to abrogate responsibility for helping economically disadvantaged women and families. A large percentage of the women who have abortions have had children and many are married. There really is only one reason they would do that: they feel they can't afford another child. If all you have to offer for the malaise of the current economy is we'll let you kill the life inside you so you can afford to eat three meals a day, I don't think we've really got women's best interests at heart, and you've just made life even more cheap than it already is.
And I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but I am pro-choice (or at least pro-it's none of my business to a point), but these arguments make me crazy.
Oh, and I don't know how other states are, but where I live, the mother can demand half the medical bills for her pregnancy from the father, so, yes, men can be made financially responsible for the child from the moment of conception.